Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Validation of a novel irritant gas syndrome triage algorithm

Joan M. Culley, PhD, MPH, RN, CWOCN, FAAN, Sara Donevant, PhD(c), MSN, RN, CCRN, Jean Craig, PhD, MS, BS, Jane Richter, DrPH, MSN, MA, RN, Abbas S. Tavakoli, DrPH, MPH, ME, Erik Svendsen, PhD, Salvatore DiNardi, PhD, CIH, FAIHA

Abstract


Objective: Our objective was to validate a novel irritant gas syndrome agent (IGSA) triage algorithm for use in an emergency department (ED). We assessed efficiency, accuracy, and precision of our IGSA triage algorithm based on signs/symptoms of actual patients.

Design: After characterizing the signs/symptoms of an actual IGSA exposure event, we developed and validated the IGSA triage algorithm using a simulated computer exercise to compare the IGSA triage algorithm to the preferred hospital triage algorithm, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI).

Setting: This study was a simulated computer exercise using surveys developed in Research Electronic Data Capture software. Nurse volunteers simulated triaging 298 patients.

Participants: Patient data included 146 patients treated during the disaster as well as 152 unexposed patients. Twenty-six nurse volunteers were assigned to triage the patients using one of the algorithms in the simulated computer exercise.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The precision of the IGSA triage algorithm was 0.82 (confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.85) and ESI 0.73 (CI 0.69-0.77). Weighted κ for ESI and IGSA accuracy for exposed patients was 0.32 (95% CI 0.26-0.37) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.85), respectively.

Results: The IGSA triage algorithm was more accurate and precise than the ESI algorithm for triaging patients exposed to an irritant gas.

Conclusions: This study validates the IGSA triage algorithm as the basis for the development of a prototype software application to quickly identify victims of a chemical disaster and triage patients efficiently and accurately with the potential to dramatically improve the processing of patients in EDs.


Keywords


triage, chemical triage algorithm, methods for disaster research

Full Text:

PDF

References


ChemicalSafetyFacts.org.: Understanding risks and hazard when it comes to chemicals. 2017. Available at https://www.chemicalsafetyfacts.org/chemistry-context/understanding-risk/?lang=CIn8-8ywktICFY6FswodBGgKMA. Accessed February 15, 2017.

Hartong M, Goel R, Wijesekera D: A risk assessment framework for TIH train routing. 2007. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Duminda_Wijesekera/publication/228345101_A_Risk_Assessment_Framework_for_TIH_Train_Routing/links/00463522db8bcb0bc2000000.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2017.

Culley JM, Svendsen E: A review of the literature on the validity of mass casualty triage systems with a focus on chemical exposures. Am J Disaster Med. 2014; 9(2): 137-150.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Hospital emergency departments get tips from AHRQ on how to reduce crowding and better triage patients. Research Activities. 2012; 379.

DeMers G, Kahn C, Johansson P, et al.: Secure scalable disaster electronic medical record and tracking system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013; 28(5): 498-501.

Culley JM, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: A validation study of 5 triage systems using data from the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, chlorine spill. J Emerg Nur. 2014; 40(5): 453-460.

Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y: Emergency department triage: An ethical analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2011; 11: 16.

Culley J, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: Triage effectiveness during a chemical incident. Paper presented at: CANS 2012 State of the Science Congress on Nursing Research Conference 2012; Washington, DC.

Culley J, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: Are current triage methods effective for all hazards mass casualty events? Paper presented at: Southern Nursing Research Conference 2012; New Orleans, LA.

Craig JB, Culley JM, Tavakoli A, et al.: Gleaning data from disaster: A hospital-based data mining method to studying all-hazard triage after a chemical disaster. Am J Disaster Med. 2013; 8(2): 97-111.

U.S. National Library of Medicine: Wireless information system for emergency responders (WISER). U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2015. Available at https://wiser.nlm.nih.gov/index.html. Accessed September 1, 2016.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Chemical hazards emergency medical management (CHEMM). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2015. Available at https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/index.html. Accessed September 2, 2016.

ESI Triage Research Team: Areas of ESI algorithm. 2017. Available at http://www.esitriage.org/algorithm.asp. Accessed June 6, 2017.

SAS for Windows 9.4 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 2013.

Tavakoli A, Culley J, Richter J, et al.: Using macro in SAS® to calculate Kappa and 95% CI for several pairs of nurses of chemical triage. Paper presented at: SAS® Global Forum, April 2-5, 2017; Orlando, FL.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al.: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42(2): 377-381.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2018.0284

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
This site uses cookies to maintain session information critical to the user's experience and environment on this system. Click "Accept Cookies" to continue.
For more details please visit our privacy statement at: Privacy & GDPR