Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Planning for a medical surge incident: Is rehabilitation the missing link?

Kay Vonderschmidt, DSc, MPA, MS, NR-P

Abstract


This mixed methods study explored surge planning for patients who will need rehabilitative care after a mass casualty incident. Planning for a patient surge incident typically considers only prehospital and hospital care. However, in many cases, disaster patients need rehabilitation for which planning is often overlooked. The purpose of this study was to explore this hidden dimension of patient rehabilitation for surge planning and preparedness and ask:

1. To what extent can an analysis of standard patient acuity assessment tools [Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment and Injury Severity Score] be used to project future demand for admission to rehabilitative care?

2. What improvements to medical disaster planning are needed to address patient surge related to rehabilitation?

This study found that standard patient benchmarks can be used to project demand for rehabilitation following a mass casualty incident, and argues that a reconceptualization of surge planning to include rehabilitation would improve medical disaster planning.


Keywords


surge planning, rehabilitation, medical disaster planning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Koenig K, Schultz C. Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

Aylwin C, Konig TC, Brennan NW, et al.: Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: Analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. The Lancet. 2006; 368: 2219-2225.

Bayrum J, Zuabi S, Subbarao I: Disaster metrics: Quantitative benchmarking of hospital surge capacity in trauma-related multiple casualty events. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011; 5:117-124.

Atanelov L, Stiens SA, Young MA: History of physical medicine and rehabilitation and its ethical dimensions. AMA J Ethics. 2015; 17(6): 568-574.

Wade DT, de Jong BA: Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ, 2000; 320(13):1385-1388.

Khan F, Amatya B, Gosney J, et al.: Medical rehabilitation in natural disasters: A review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96:1709-1727.

Gosney J, Reinhardt JD, Haig AJ, et al.: Developing post-disaster physical rehabilitation: Role of the World Health Organization liaison sub-committee on rehabilitative disaster relief of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43: 965-968.

Rathore FA, Gosney JE, Reinhardt JD, et al.: Medical rehabilitation after natural disasters: Why, when, and how? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93; 1875-1881.

Watson S, Rudge J, Coker R: Health systems' surge capacity: State of the art and priorities for future research. Milbank Q. 2013; 91(1): 78-122.

Weifeng S, Libing J, Mao Z, et al.: Research approaches to mass casualty incidents response: Development from routine perspectives to complexity science. Chin Med J. 2014; 127(13): 2523-2530.

Palmer, C: Major Trauma and the Injury Severity Score- where should we set the bar? Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007; 51: 13-29.

Nemunaitis G, Roach MJ, Claridge J, et al.: Early predictors of functional outcome after trauma. PMR J. 2016; 314-320.

Sirois MJ, Lavoie A, Dionne C: Impact of transfer delays to rehabilitation in patients with severe trauma. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 184-191.

Runyan CW: Using the Haddon matrix: Introducing the third dimension. Inj Prev. 19 98; 4: 302-307.

Barnett DJ, Balicer RD, Lucey DR, et al.: A systematic analytic approach to pandemic influenza preparedness planning. PLoS Med, 2005; 2: 12.

Lindsay BR, McCarthy FX: Stafford Act Declarations 1953-2014: Trends, Analyses, and Implications for Congress. Congressional Research Service; 2015.

Landewe R, Van Der Heijde D. Radiographic progression depicted by probability plots. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2004; 50(3): 699-706.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2017.0269

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.