Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Superstorm Sandy: Emergency management staff perceptions of impact and recommendations for future preparedness, New York State

Adam Yanson, MPH, Asante Shipp Hilts, MPH, DrPH, Stephanie Mack, BS, Millicent Eidson, MA, DVM, DACVPM, Trang Nguyen, MD, DrPH, Guthrie Birkhead, MD, MPH

Abstract


Objective: This study collected and summarized feedback from staff at the New York State (NYS) Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and three county OEMs within NYS to understand lessons learned from the 2012 Superstorm Sandy.

Design: Cross-sectional qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Subjects, Participants: One staff person from each identified critical role from the state and county OEMs who were still employed in the roles identified. Interventions: In-person interviews in 2014 followed by an anonymous survey in 2015 examined the response strengths, challenges, and recommendations using federally and study-defined Public Health Preparedness Capabilities. Quantitative analysis of staff survey ratings was used to summarize perceptions of interagency collaboration, communication effectiveness, and differences by staff position.

Results: Response rates were 78 percent for interviews (n = 7) and 45 percent for surveys (n = 36). In interviews, “emergency operations coordination” was cited most frequently (48 percent), specifically for successful interagency coordination. “Emergency operations coordination” was also cited most among challenges (45 percent), with emphasis on problems with uniformity of software systems across agencies. Survey responses indicated that “volunteer management” (50 percent) and the “safety and health of responders” (40 percent) were frequently reported as challenges. Additionally, 38 percent of OEM staff reported that situation reports submitted by health departments need improvement. Recommendations from OEM staff included “emergency operations coordination” (36 percent) such as sharing of resources and “training” (16 percent) including hospital evacuation training.

Conclusions: Analysis of OEM staff feedback identified specific challenges, and concrete recommendations were made to improve response going forward.


Keywords


disaster planning, emergency management, emergency preparedness, Superstorm, public health

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blake E, Kimberlain R, Berg R, et al.: Tropical cyclone report Hurricane Sandy (AL182012). 2013. National Hurricane Center. Available at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2016.

Lane K, Charles-Guzman K, Wheeler K, et al.: Health effects of coastal storms and flooding in urban areas: A review and vulnerability assessment. J Environ Public Health. 2013; e913064.

Diglio M, Benedetto N, Raneri J: Along came Sandy: How NYC REMSCO helped coordinate the evacuation of 6000-plus patients

during Superstorm Sandy. JEMS. 2013; 38(5): 32-38.

Ricci K, Griffin A, Heslin K, et al.: Evacuate or shelter-in-place? The role of corporate memory and political environment in hospital-evacuation decision making. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015; 30(3): 233-238.

Howland R, Madsen A, Leze N, et al.: Assessing electronic death registration and American Red Cross systems for mortality surveillance during Hurricane Sandy, October 29-November 10, 2012, New York City. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014; 8(6): 489-491.

Shipp Hilts A, Mack S, Eidson M, et al.: New York State public health system response to Hurricane Sandy: An analysis of emergency reports. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016; 10(3): 308-313.

Shipp Hilts A, Mack S, Li Y, et al.: New York State public health system response to Hurricane Sandy: An analysis of survey feedback. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016; 10(3): 454-462.

Shipp Hilts A, Mack S, Eidson M, et al.: New York State public health system response to Hurricane Sandy: Lessons from the field.

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016; 10(3): 443-453.

Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response: Public health preparedness capabilities: National standards for state and local

planning. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/capabilities. Published August 25, 2015. Accessed February 2, 2016.

Errett NA, Egan S, Garrity S, et al.: Attitudinal determinants of local public health workers’ participation in Hurricane Sandy recovery activities. Health Secur. 2015; 13(4): 267-273.

Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, et al. (eds.): Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Available at https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-PartA_FINAL.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/jem.2017.0330

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Emergency Management