Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A pilot study of nasal fentanyl for patient controlled treatment of cancer pain

M. Thronæs, MD, S. Kaasa, MD, PhD, O. Dale, MD, PhD

Abstract


Background: Slow release (SR) opioids around the clock are the mainstay for moderate to strong cancer pain. This recommendation is not scientifically based. Therefore, a phase 1 pilot study of rapid acting nasal fentanyl (NF) taken on demand as the only opioid for cancer pain to explore feasibility and safety aspects was launched.

Methods: Patients with cancer, naïve to strong opioids but in need of such drugs, were included. They received a test dose of NF before titration (1-5 days) was started. Ten days treatment was followed by 7 days of observation after switching to SR morphine. Pain relief, nausea, sedation, and local irritation were assessed (11-point numeric rating scale [NRS]). Other adverse events (AEs) were also recorded by the patient. Investigator had regular patient telephone contact.

Results: Ten patients were included. The test dose was well tolerated. Venous fentanyl concentrations at 11 minutes after the test dose differed considerably. All subjects completed the titration; six patients the treatment phase. Three serious AEs were reported; all due to hospitalization, none related to NF. A possible adverse drug reaction (hearing abnormalities) was reported. Other adverse effects were minor. NF treatment reduced average pain for the whole group compared to baseline (4.6-3.7 on the 11-point NRS) and pain relief was achieved in 187/230 (81 percent) of NF administrations (reduction of 2 or more on the 11-piont NRS 15 minutes after NF administration).

Conclusion: This explorative study suggests that it is reasonable that the concept of treating pain in patients with cancer using NF on demand can undergo controlled clinical studies.


Keywords


pain relief, neoplasm, opioids, pain ladder, incident pain, nasal, fentanyl

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO: Cancer Pain Relief. Geneva: WHO, 1996.

Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, et al.: Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: Evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(2): e58-e68.

Portenoy RK, Hagen NA: Breakthrough pain: Definition and management. Oncology. 1989; 3(8 suppl): 25-29.

Knudsen AK, Brunelli C, Kaasa S, et al.: Which variables are associated with pain intensity and treatment response in advanced cancer patients?–Implications for a future classification system for cancer pain. Eur J Pain. 2011; 15(3): 320-327.

Walsh TD, MacDonald N, Bruera E, et al.: A controlled study of sustained-release morphine sulfate tablets in chronic pain from advanced cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 1992; 15(3): 268-272.

Finn JW, Walsh TD, MacDonald N, et al.: Placebo-blinded study of morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets and immediate-release morphine sulfate solution in outpatients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11(5): 967-972.

Young-McCaughan S, Miaskowski C: Definition of and mechanism for opioid-induced sedation. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001; 2(3): 84-97.

Redmond M, Glass P: Opiate-induced nausea and vomiting: What is the challenge? Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(5): 1341-1342.

Laugsand EA, Kaasa S, de Conno F, et al.: Intensity and treatment of symptoms in 3,030 palliative care patients: A cross-sectional survey of the EAPC Research Network. J Opioid Manag. 2009; 5(1): 11-21.

Barnes EA, Bruera E: Fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: A review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002; 12(5): 424-428.

Moore P, Dimsdale JE: Opioids, sleep, and cancer-related fatigue. Med Hypotheses. 2002; 58(1): 77-82.

Villars P, Dodd M, West C, et al.: Differences in the prevalence and severity of side effects based on type of analgesic prescription in patients with chronic cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007; 33(1): 67-77.

Farrar JT, Cleary J, Rauck R, et al.: Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial for treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(8): 611-616.

Christrup LL, Foster D, Popper LD, et al.: Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of fentanyl following intranasal versus intravenous administration in adults undergoing third-molar extraction: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-way, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2008; 30(3): 469-481.

Moksnes K, Fredheim OM, Klepstad P, et al.: Early pharmacokinetics of nasal fentanyl: Is there a significant arterio-venous difference? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 64(5): 497-502.

Foster D, Upton R, Christrup L, et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal versus intravenous fentanyl in patients with pain after oral surgery. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42(10): 1380-1387.

Kress HG, Oronska A, Kaczmarek Z, et al.: Efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl spray 50 to 200 microg for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer: A phase III, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with a 10-month, open-label extension treatment period. Clin Ther. 2009; 31(6): 1177-1191.

Fallon M, Reale C, Davies A, et al.: Efficacy and safety of fentanyl pectin nasal spray compared with immediate-release morphine sulfate tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy multiple-crossover study. J Support Oncol. 2011; 9(6): 224-231.

Passik SD, Kirsh KL: Weighing in on the off-label use of Actiq for noncancer-related pain: A recipe for success or a recipe for disaster? Pain Med. 2007; 8(2): 130-133.

Bennett RL, Batenhorst RL, Bivins BA, et al.: Patient-controlled analgesia: A new concept of postoperative pain relief. Ann Surg. 1982; 195(6): 700-705.

Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, et al.: Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (4): CD003348.

Michna E, Ross EL, Hynes WL, et al.: Predicting aberrant drug behavior in patients treated for chronic pain: Importance of abuse history. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 28(3): 250-258.

Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, et al.: Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000; 88(3): 287-294.

Mercadante S, Radbruch L, Davies A, et al.: A comparison of intranasal fentanyl spray with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: An open-label, randomised, crossover trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25(11): 2805-2815.

Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, et al.: Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: An evidence-based report. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(9): 2542-2554.

Klepstad P, Kaasa S, Skauge M, et al.: Pain intensity and side effects during titration of morphine to cancer patients using a fixed schedule dose escalation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000; 44(6): 656-664.

Farrar JT: Advances in clinical research methodology for pain clinical trials. Nat Med. 2010; 16(11): 1284-1293.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/jom.2014.0188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
This site uses cookies to maintain session information critical to the user's experience and environment on this system. Click "Accept Cookies" to continue.
For more details please visit our privacy statement at: Privacy & GDPR