Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Perceived barriers of non-US healthcare providers to responding during mass casualty incidents

Dolores J. Wright, PhD, RN

Abstract


Nurses and other healthcare providers (HCPs) have a long history of providing care during extreme emergencies, disasters, or mass casualty incidents (MCIs). Surveys have been conducted in US metropolitan areas to determine the ability and willingness of HCP to respond to an MCIs. Various barriers were identified in those studies.
The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions and attitudes of HCPs in other countries and cultures to barriers they may have in their ability or willingness to respond during an MCI. The study participants were 42 nurses completing their master’s degree, representing 26 different countries and territories, and they were assigned to one of eight focus groups based on the location of their country of origin.
The findings revealed several themes, the first being that in some countries there were no perceived barriers to either ability or willingness to respond to an MCI. In other countries, the perceived barriers to ability were lack of transportation, staff shortages, equipment shortages, personal illness, and lack of infant care, whereas the perceived barriers to willingness were dimensions of fear and employment status. Cultural differences played a significant role in the ability and willingness of the HCPs to respond to an MCI.


Keywords


mass casualty, disaster response, barriers to response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bourne DA, Ferguson-Pare M: Persevering through a difficult time during the SARS outbreak in Toronto. Nurs Sci Quart. 2005; 18: 324-333.

Weiner E, Irwin M, Tragenstein P, et al.: Emergency preparedness curriculum in US nursing schools: Survey results. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005; 26: 334-339.

Littleton-Kearney MT, Slepski LA: Directions for disaster nursing education in the United States. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2008; 20: 103-109.

CBS News: Nursing industry desperate for new hires. Available at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/05/health. Accessed January 6, 2009.

Bush BL: Global nurse migration today. J Nurs Scholarship. 2008; 40: 20-25.

Fang ZZ: Potential of China in global nurse migration. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 1419-1428.

Pittman P, Aiken LH, Buchan J: International migration of nurses: Introduction. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 1275-1280.

Xu Y: Are Chinese nurses a viable source to relieve the U.S. nurse shortage? Nurs Econ. 2003; 21: 269-274.

Syrett JI, Benitez JG, Livingston WH, et al.: Will emergency healthcare providers respond to mass casualty incidents? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11: 49-54.

Qureshi K, Gershon RR, Sherman MF, et al.: Healthcare workers’ ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health. 2005; 82: 387-388.

Morgan D: Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.

Denzin NK, Lincolin YS: Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.

Morse J: Confusing categories and themes. Qual Health Res. 2008; 18: 727-728.

Wuest J: Grounded theory: The method. In Munhall PL (ed.): Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. 4th ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 2007: 239-271.

Wolf ZR: Ethnography: The method. In Munhall PL (ed.): Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. 4th ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 2007: 293-330.

Kane-Urrabazo C: Duty in a time of disaster: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2007; 42: 56-64.

Nasrabadi AN, Naji H, Mirzabeigi G, et al.: Earthquake relief: Iranian nurses’ responses in Bam, 2003, and lessons learned. Int Nurs Rev. 2007; 54: 13-18.

Liebergall MH, Braverman N, Shapira SC, et al.: Role of nurses in a university hospital during mass casualty events. Am J Crit Care. 2007; 16: 480-484.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2009.0047

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.