Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A comparison of different types of hazardous material respirators available to anesthesiologists

Keith A. Candiotti, MD, Yiliam Rodriguez, MD, Ilya Shekhter, MS, Catalina Castillo-Pedraza, MD, Lisa Forman Rosen, MA, Kristopher L. Arheart, EdD, David J. Birnbach, MD, MPH

Abstract


Objective: Despite anesthesiology personnel involvement in initial treatment of patients exposed to potentially lethal agents, less than 40 percent of US anesthesiology training programs conduct training to manage these patients.1 No previous studies have evaluated performance of anesthesiologists wearing protective gear. The authors compared the performance of anesthesiologists intubating a high-fidelity mannequin while wearing either a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) or a negative pressure respirator (NPR).
Methods: Twenty participants practiced intubations on a high-fidelity simulator until comfortable. Each subject performed 10 repetitions, initially without any gear, then while wearing a protective suit, gloves, and respirator. The order of gear use was randomized and all subjects used both devices. Time for task completion were recorded, and at the end of the trial, subjects were asked to rate their comfort with the equipment.
Results: After controlling for other variables, overall statistically slower total performance times were observed with use of the PAPR when compared to the control arm and use of the NPR (p = 0.01 and p < 0.007, respectively). Of the total 90 intubations, only one proved to be esophageal and initially undetected.
Conclusions: The use of an NPR or PAPR does not preclude an anesthesiologist from successfully intubating, but practice is necessary. The slightly better performance with the NPR is weighed against the improved comfort of the PAPR and the fact that PAPR users could wear eyeglasses. Neither type of gear allowed the users to auscultate the lung fields to confirm correct endotracheal tube placement.


Keywords


weapons of mass destruction,HAZMAT gear, infectious disease control, mass casualty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Candiotti KA, Kamat A, Barach P, et al.: Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents: A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: 1135-1140.

Cooper A, Joglekar A, AdhiKari N: A practical approach to airway management in patients with SARS. CMAJ. 2003; 169(8): 785-787.

Rubinson L, Nuzzo JB, Talmor DS, et al.: Augmentation of hospital critical care capacity after bioterrorist attacks or epidemics: Recommendations of the working group on Emergency Mass Critical Care. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(10): 2393-2403.

Ofuer M, Lenn M, Sarwal S, et al.: Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected healthcare workers—Toronto, April 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2003; 29(11): 93-97.

Best practices for the protection of hospitals-based first receivers. Available at http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/bestpractices/html/hospital_firstreceivers.html. Accessed September 2012.

Flaishon R, Sotman A, Friedman A, et al.: Laryngeal mask airway insertion by anesthetists and non-anesthetists wearing unconventional protective gear: A prospective, randomized, crossover study in humans. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(2): 267-273.

Notices to Readers NIOSH Guidelines for Protecting the Safety and Health of Health-Care Workers. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/p0000154/P0000154.asp. Accessed September 2012.

Arad M, Berkenstadt H, Zelingher J, et al.: The effects of continuous operation in chemical protective ensemble on the performance of medical tasks in trauma management. J Trauma. 1993; 35(5): 800-804.

Holmer I: Protective clothing in hot environments. Ind Health. 2006; 44: 404-413.

O’Brien C, Blanchard LA, Cadarette B, et al.: Methods of evaluating protective clothing relative to heat and cold stress: Thermal manikin, biomedical modeling, and human testing. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011; 8: 588-599.

Williamson R, Carbo J, Luna B, et al.: A thermal physiological comparison of two HAZMAT protective ensembles with and without active convective cooling. J Occup Environ Med. 1999; 41(6): 453-463.

Nagler J, Krauss B: Capnography: A valuable tool for airway management. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2008; 26: 881-897.

Candiotti KA, Rodríguez YF, Curia LM, et al.: Radiostethoscopes: An innovative solution for auscultation while wearing protective gear. Am J Disaster Med. 2011; 6(5): 285-288.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2012.0104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.