Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Preparedness of senior centers for active shooter incidents

Steven Lawrence Paciorek, PhD, Lauren Birmingham, PhD, MA, Anuja L. Sarode, MPH, Sonia Alemagno, PhD

Abstract


Objective: The main objective was to evaluate the preparedness of senior centers (SCs) for active shooter (AS) events and test the hypothesis that most SCs were not organized to properly handle AS incidents.

Design: A cross-sectional study based on questionnaire with quantitative measures.

Setting: A questionnaire-based multistate survey of SC Directors (SCDs) of public and private SCs.

Participants: SCs were included upon receipt of answers from SCDs to questionnaire-based survey, resulting in 139 SCs from Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Maryland, Indiana, Illinois, New York, and West Virginia.

Main outcome measure: SCs, SCDs, and SCs’ staff preparedness and vulnerability to an AS event.

Results: Over half (56 percent) of SCDs replied that their center was not prepared for an AS event. A significant (p < 0.01) association was found between the SCD’s perception of being prepared and the availability of a formal AS preventive policy. The lack of panic buttons and surveillance cameras was significantly (p < 0.01) associated with the feeling of inability by SCDs to respond effectively to an AS event. Those SCDs who were confident about their AS preparedness felt significantly (p < 0.01) better prepared to respond to an AS incident. Personal interviews with content experts agreed that all SCDs should take steps to develop an official AS preparedness policy, but its implementation should be the direct responsibility of local policymakers and legislators.

Conclusions: Most SDCs and SCs are unprepared for AS incidents. SCDs should review or develop specific recommendations and implement plans for a better preparedness of SCs and SCDs for AS events. Considering the inherent high vulnerability of older adults, there is an urgent need to have such AS policy in place.


Keywords


active shooter, active shooter incident, active shooter preparedness, senior centers, senior centers directors, older adults, vulnerable populations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blair JP, Schweit KW: A study of active shooter incidents in the United States, 2000-2013. US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2013. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594362.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2018.

Booker L Jr: Crisis management: Changing times for colleges. J Coll Admission. 2014; 222: 16-23.

Campo-Flores A, Carlton J, Emshwiller JR: Shootings put focus on campus security (Cover story). Wall Street Journal—Eastern Edition. October 3, 2015. Available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/oregon-college-shootings-put-focus-on-campus-security-1443831441. Accessed July 8, 2018.

Fox JA, Savage J: Mass murder goes to college an examination of changes on college campuses following Virginia tech. Am Behav Sci. 2009; 52(10): 1465-1485. DOI: 10.1177/0002764209332558.

Glasofer A, Laskowski-Jones L: Mass shootings: A call for nursing awareness and action. Nursing. 2018; 48(12): 50-55. DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000549496.58492.26.

Sulkowski ML, Lazarus PJ: Contemporary responses to violent attacks on college campuses. J Sch Violence. 2011; 10(4): 338-354.

Sullivan DK: Higher education emergency management survey. J Chem Health Saf. 2012; 19(4): 36-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchas.2011.10.001.

Jia W, Hutchins HM: Crisis management in higher education: What have we learned from Virginia tech? Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2010; 12(5): 552-572. DOI: 10.1177/1523422310394433.

Dugas N: Active shooter training: A recommended addition to the basic peace officer course. 2017. Available at https://shsu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11875/2287/1725.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Published June. Accessed September 5, 2018.

Glasofer A: Active shooter incidents: Awareness and action. Nurs Manage. 2019; 50(3): 18-25. DOI: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000553498.47779.ed.

US mass killings hit a record high. ‘This seems to be the age of mass shootings’. USA Today Website. 2019. Available at https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/12/28/us-mass-shootings-killings-2019-41-record-high/2748794001/. Accessed January 10, 2020.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Identifying vulnerable older adults and legal options for increasing their protection during all-hazards emergencies: A cross-sector guide for states and communities. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/cpr/documents/aging.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2018.

Iowa College of Public Health: Available at https://now.uiowa.edu/2014/03/ui-study-older-adults-usnot-prepared-natural-disasters. Accessed November 23, 2018.

Ablah E, Konda K, Kelley CL: Factors predicting individual emergency preparedness: A multi-state analysis of 2006 BRFSS data. Biosecur Bioterror Biodefense Strategy Practice Sci. 2009; 7(3): 317-330. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0022.

Preparedness for natural disasters among older US adults: A nationwide survey. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: S614-S626. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301559.

Cherniack EP: The impact of natural disasters on the elderly. Am J Disaster Med. 2008; 3(3): 133-139.

Heagele TN: A Qualitative Study of Household Emergency Preparedness of the Older Adults and the Medically Frail Living in Coastal Urban Environments [Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University-Graduate School-Newark, 2018. DOI: 10.7282/T3TB1B3V.

Murphy ST, Cody M, Frank LB, et al.: Predictors of emergency preparedness and compliance. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2009; 3(2): 1-10.

Qualtrics Survey Software: Available at https://www.qualtrics.com. Accessed March 20, 2019.

Smyth JD, Dillman DA, Christian LM, et al.: Open-ended questions in web surveys: Can increasing the size of answer boxes and providing extra verbal instructions improve response quality? Public Opin Q. 2009; 73(2): 325-337. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfp029.

Croasmun JT, Ostrom L: Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences. J Adult Educ. 2011; 40(1): 19-22.

SAS Institute Inc.: SAS® 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2013. 23. Goddard RD, Goddard YL: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching Teacher Educ. 2001; 17(7): 807-818. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00032-4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2021.0395

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.