Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Enabling the homeland security enterprise through systems engineering the National Exercise Program

Kenneth G. Crowther, PhD, Anna K. A. M. Gradishar, MS, Michael R. French, DBA

Abstract


On August 17, 2010, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano signed a memorandum directing an evolution of the National Exercise Program (NEP). The Memo emphasized the importance of the NEP for strengthening and evaluating our nation’s preparedness and reinforced core statutory and regulatory guidance.While the NEP has traditionally focused on national-level exercises, the revised NEP should serve the full homeland security enterprise. This article suggests a direction for evolution of the proposed NEP. It describes how exercise components and stakeholders operate and how they might be better synchronized using methodical system engineering and the careful application of innovative science and technology. Central to aligning and integrating subsystems into a coherent, synergistic whole is the concept of “interface.” System interfaces focus on describing common standards and protocols by which system components relate, interact, and share information. The authors identify five process interfaces from the Secretary’s Memo and describe system architecting principles that could improve NEP flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and robustness. Systems engineering methodologies provide time-proven approaches to describe system characteristics and behavior in ways that facilitate the development of effective interfaces—interfaces that promote overall systems efficiency and provide a basis for measuring and tracking systems performance. This harmonization of information promotes the application of modeling and simulation, which, in turn, promote greater exercise realism and efficiency and create a scientific environment in which to explore and experiment with new concepts and technologies.

Keywords


homeland security, emergency preparedness, National Exercise Program, systems engineering, systems of systems

Full Text:

PDF

References


Napolitano J: National Exercise Program. Memorandum for W. Craig Fugate and All DHS Components on August 17, 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, 2010.

Bush GW: Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-8, National Preparedness. Washington, DC: White House, December 17, 2003.

Congressional Reporting Service (CRS): Homeland Emergency Preparedness and the National Exercise Program: Background, Policy Implications, and Issues for Congress. RL34737, November 10, 2008.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): National Preparedness: FEMA has Made Progress, but Needs to Complete and Integrate Planning, Exercise, and Assessment Efforts. GAO-09-369, April 30, 2009.

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS OIG): DHS Efforts to Address Lessons Learned in the Aftermath of Top Officials Exercises. OIG-09-53, April 10, 2009.

Katz A, Staiti AB, McKenzie KL: Preparing for the unknown, responding to the known: Communities and public health preparedness. Health Affairs. 2006; 25(4): 946-957.

Bowen KC: Research Games: An Approach to the Study of Decision Processes. London: Taylor & Francis, 1978.

Keys B,Wolfe J: The role of management games and simulations in education and research. J Manag. 1990; 16(2): 307-336.

Lane D: On a resurgence of management simulations and games. J Oper Res Soc. 1995; 46(5): 604-625.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): DHS Risk-Based Grant Methodology is Reasonable, but Current Version’s Measure of Vulnerability is Limited. GAO-08-852, June 27, 2008.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): National Response Framework: FEMA Needs Policies and Procedures to Better Integrate Non-Federal Stakeholders in the Revision Process. GAO-08-768, June 11, 2008.

The Technical Cooperation Program (TTCP): Guide for Understanding and Implementing Defense Experimentation, GUIDEx. Version 1.1, February 10, 2006. Available at http://www.dtic.mil/ttcp/GUIDExBookFeb2006.pdf. Accessed October 2011.

Dausey D, Buehler J, Lurie N: Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7: 92.

Biddinger PD, Cadigan RO, Auerbach BS, et al.: Using exercises to identify system-level preparedness challenges. Public Health Rep. 2008; 113(1): 96-101.

Zantow K, Knowlton D, Sharp D: More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2005; 4(4): 451-458.

Gebbie K, Valas J, Merrill J, et al.: Role of exercises and drills in the evaluation of public health emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006; 21(3): 173-182.

Wise CR: Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what’s missing? Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(May-June): 302-318.

Wise CR, Nader R: Organizing the federal system for homeland security: Problems, issues, and dilemmas. Public Adm Rev. 2002; 62(September): 44-57.

Maier MW: Architecting principles for systems of systems. Syst Eng. 1998; 1(4): 267-284.

Sage AP, Cuppan CD: On the system engineering and management of systems. Inf Knowl Syst Manag. 2001; 2(2001): 325-345.

DHS: National Preparedness Guidelines. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, 2007.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): GAO High Risk and Other Major Government Challenges: Improving Oversight and Management of Homeland Security Grant Programs. 2010.Available at http://www.gao.gov/highrisk/opportunities/national_security/grant-programs.php. Accessed October 15, 2010.

Holtermann K: Exercise Modeling and Simulation Briefing. Washington, DC: National Exercise Simulation Center, Federal Emergency Management Agency, March 4, 2010.

DHS: Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Instruction/Guidebook (DHS AIG) #102-01-001, Interim Version 1.9, November 7, 2008.

Rechtin E: System Architecting: Creating and Building Complex Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.

Handy C: Balancing corporate power: A new federalist paper. Harv Bus Rev. 1992; 70(6): 59-72.

Buede DM: The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods. New York:Wiley, 2009.

Sage AP, Rouse WB: Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management. New York:Wiley, 2009.

Hutchings CW: Enabling homeland security with modeling and simulation (M&S). M&S J. 2010; 5(1): 17-27.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2012.0092

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Emergency Management