Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Organizations and emergency management: Information, trust, and preparedness

Sheila M. Huss, MA, Abdul-Akeem Sadiq, PhD, Christopher M. Weible, PhD

Abstract


In what ways do information and trust relate to the level of organizational preparedness for disasters? Interview and survey data on 227 organizations in Memphis/Shelby County, TN, were analyzed to assess the extent to which organizations use disaster-related information for decision making, and report the information as adequate and relevant. Organizations were also asked to identify their sources for disaster-related information, whom they trust for helping them prepare for disasters, and their level of preparedness for disasters. The results show that more than half of the organizations in Memphis/Shelby County relied on information for disaster management, and of these organizations, the overwhelming majority agreed that the information was both adequate and relevant. The police and fire departments, Memphis/Shelby County Emergency Management Agency, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention were identified by responding organizations as major sources of information and as organizations that they trusted the most to help them prepare for disasters. Organizations that relied on the Memphis City Government for information were more likely than other organizations to report that they were prepared for disasters.Finally, organizations that relied on the media as one of their top three information sources were less likely than other organizations to report that they were prepared for disasters.

Keywords


emergency management, organizations, trust, information, Memphis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Major AM: The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction. Public Relat Rev. 1998; 24(4): 489-508.

The 9/11 commission report. September 20, 2004. Available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/index.htm. Accessed March 14, 2008.

Dirks KT, Ferrin DL: The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ Sci. 2001; 12(4): 250-267.

Atwood LE, Major AM: Optimism, pessimism, and communication behavior in response to an earthquake prediction. Public Underst Sci. 2000; 9: 1-15.

Celsi R,Wolfinbarger M,Wald D: The effect of earthquake measurement concepts and magnitude anchoring on individuals’ perceptions of earthquake risk. Earthq Spectra. 2005; 21(4): 987-1008.

Hwang SN, Sanderson WG, Lindell MK: Analysis of state emergency management agencies’ hazard analysis information on the Internet. Int J Mass Emerg Disaster. 2005; 19: 85-106.

Anspach MS: Is a change in the theory of the person necessary? Brit J Phil Sci. 1991; 46(3): 361-380.

Lindell MK, Perry RW: Planning and preparedness. In Waugh WL Jr, Tierney K (eds.): Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Governments. Washington, DC: ICMA Press, 2007: 113-139.

McManus DJ, Carr HH: Risk and the need for business continuity planning. In Doughty K (ed.): Business Continuity Planning: Protecting Your Organization’s Life. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications, 2001.

Norton BG: Sustainability: A Philosophy Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

National Research Council. Understanding Risk Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1996.

Baden BM, Douglas SN, Rama MT: Scales of justice: Is there a geographic bias in environmental equity analysis? J Environ Plan Manage. 2007; 50(2): 163-185.

Turner RH, Nigg JM, Paz D: Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.

Farley JE, Barlow HD, Finkelstein MS, et al.: Earthquake hysteria, before and after: A survey and follow-up on public response to the Browning forecast. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993; 11: 305-322.

Showalter PS: Prognostication of doom: An earthquake prediction’s effect on four small communities. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993; 11: 279-292.

Available at http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/. Accessed October 14, 2011.

New York University: The Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response (NYU.CCPR). Available at http://www.nyu.edu/ccpr/. Accessed October 14, 2011.

Available at www.redcross.org. Accessed October 14, 2011.

Jackson EL, Mukerjee T: Human adjustment to the earthquake hazard of San Francisco, California. In White GF (ed.): Natural Hazards: Local, National and Global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1974: 160-166.

Sullivan R, Mustart DA, Galehouse JS: Living in earthquake country. Calif Geol. 1977; 30: 3-8.

Palm RI: Public response to earthquake hazard information. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 1981; 71(3): 389-399.

Turner RH: Waiting for disaster: Changing reactions to earthquake forecasts in Southern California. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1983; 1: 307-334.

Russell L, Goltz JD, Bourque LB: Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environ Behav. 1995; 27: 744-770.

Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK, et al.: Public support for earthquake risk mitigation in Portland, Oregon. Risk Anal. 1999; 19(2): 205.

Tierney KJ: Impacts of Recent Disasters on Businesses: The 1993 Midwest Floods and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake (NCEER-SP-0001). Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering and Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.

Webb GR, Tierney KJ, Dahlhamer JM: Business and disasters: Empirical patterns and unanswered questions. Nat Hazards Rev. 2000; 1(2): 83-90.

Auf der Heide E: Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. Available at http://Orgmail2.coe-dmha.org/dr/flash.htm. Accessed March 14, 2008.

Sadiq AA,Weible C: Obstacles and disaster risk reduction: Survey of Memphis organizations. Nat Hazards Rev. 2010; 11(3): 110-117.

Dirks KT, Ferrin DL: Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J Appl Psych. 2002; 87: 611-628.

Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R: Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Acad Manage Rev. 2001; 26: 431-445.

Williams CC: Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Bus Soc. 1995; 44: 357-368.

Berger CR, Bradac JJ: Language and social knowledge. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, 1982.

Grabowski M, Roberts KH: Risk mitigation in virtual organizations. Organ Sci. 1999; 10(6): 704-721.

Charlier T: THE BIG QUAKE: How Ready are We? Commercial Appeal. December 11, 2005. Available at http://www.showme.net/~fkeller/quake/lib/memphis1.htm. Accessed October 14, 2011.

Spence WJ, Herrmann RB, Johnston AC, et al.: Responses to Iben Browning’s prediction of a 1990 New Madrid, Missouri, earthquake. 1993. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1993/1083/report.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2011.

USGS: The Mississippi Valley-”Whole Lotta Shakin’ Goin’ On.” 1998. Available at http://quake.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMadrid/. Accessed October 14, 2011.

Penick JL: The New Madrid Earthquakes. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1981.

Shepard S: Businesses get creative in wake of storm. Memphis Bus J. 2003. Available at http://memphis.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2003/08/04/story4.html. Accessed August 1, 2003.

May PJ: Disaster Policy Implementation: Managing Programs Under Shared Governance. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1986.

Edwards ML: Social location and self-protective behavior: Implications for earthquake preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993; 11: 293-304.

Nigg J, Tierney KJ: Projections of business disruption due to earthquake effects in Memphis, Tennessee. Paper presented at The Natural Hazard Research Symposium, Louisville, KY, 1994.

Dahlhamer JM, D’Souza MJ: Determinants of business disaster preparedness in two U.S. metropolitan areas. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1997; 15: 265-281.

Sadiq AA: Digging through disaster rubble in search of the determinants of organizational mitigation and preparedness. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2010; 1(2): Article 2.

Kiecolt KJ, Nigg, JM: Mobility and perceptions of a hazardous environment. Environ Behav. 1982; 14: 131-154.

Davis MS: Living along the fault line: An update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Southern California. Urban Resour. 1989; 5: 8-14.

Mileti DS, Darlington JD, Fitzpatrick C, et al.: Communicating Earthquake Risk: Societal Response to Revised Probabilities in the Bay Area. Fort Collins: Hazard Assessment Laboratory and Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, 1993.

Mulilis JP, Duval TS: Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: A person-relative-to-event PrE model of coping with threat. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1995; 25: 1319-1339.

Argothy V: Perceptions of Acceptable Levels of Performance of Different Elements in the Built Environment in the Event of a Major Earthquake. Preliminary Paper 331, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 2003.

May PJ, Wood RS: At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2003; 13(2): 117-139.

Wood RS: Earthquake entrepreneurs: Local policy systems and the regulation of public risks in California. State Local Gov Rev. 2004; 36(3): 198-211.

Quarantelli EL: Problematic aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research: Ten nontechnical issues and questions. Disaster Prev Manag. 1997; 6(2): 94-106.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2012.0113

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Emergency Management