Emergency management policies and natural hazards in the United States: A state-level analysis

Luis M. Pinet-Peralta, PhD; Rick Bissell, PhD; Katrina Hein, BSc, MSc; David Prakash, MSc

doi:10.5055/jem.2011.0051

Authors

Luis M. Pinet-Peralta, PhD
Rick Bissell, PhD
Katrina Hein, BSc, MSc
David Prakash, MSc

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2011.0051

Keywords:

emergency management, public policy, planning, natural disasters, mitigation

Abstract

Every year, natural hazards kill and injure hundreds of people and also have significant social, economic, and political effects on society. However, not all disasters or crises are the focus of state, regional, or national efforts to mitigate their effects. In this article, the authors use Wilson’s policy typology to describe the unintended consequences that disaster legislation has had on the distribution of costs and benefits of disaster relief programs in the United States. The data provide evidence that the concentration of disaster relief programs for natural disasters is not based on need and that interest groups commonly drive disaster policies to benefit those with the greatest risk for losses rather than those in greatest need. Policymakers can use this information to examine both intended and unintended consequences of disaster response and recovery policies and can orient the limited resources available toward those who are least capable of recovering from natural disasters.

Author Biographies

Luis M. Pinet-Peralta, PhD

Department of Public Policy, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

Rick Bissell, PhD

Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

Katrina Hein, BSc, MSc

Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

David Prakash, MSc

Department of Public Policy, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

References

Bissell RA, Pinet L, Nelson M, et al.: Evidence of the effectiveness of health sector preparedness in disaster response. Fam Community Health. 2004; 27(3): 193-203.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Federal Disaster Declarations. Available at http://www.fema.gov/news/disasters. fema. Accessed June 22, 2009.

World Health Organization: The health sector in disaster reduction and emergency management. Paper presented at the International Public Health Conference “Health 21 in Action.” Istanbul: WHO, 2002.

Anbarci N, Escaleras M, Register C: Earthquake fatalities: The interaction of nature and political economy. J Public Econ. 2005; 89(9-10): 1907-1933.

Barton A: Disaster and collective stress. In Perry R, Quarantelli E (eds.): What Is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. Newark, DE: International Research Committee on Disasters, 2005: 125-152.

Milleti D: Losses, costs and impacts. In Milleti D (ed.): Disasters by Design.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2001: 65-103.

Perry R, Quarantelli E: What Is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. Newark, DE: International Research Committee on Disasters, 2005.

Basher R: Disaster impacts: Implications and policy responses. Soc Res. 2008; 75(3): 937-954.

Cutter S, Boruff B, Shirley W: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003; 84(2): 242-261.

Cutter S, Emrich C: Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2006; 604(1): 102-112.

Zebrowski E: Perils of a Restless Planet: Scientific Perspectives on Natural Disasters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Cuny F: Introduction to disaster management. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1992; 7(4): 400-408.

Dror Y: Decision-making under disaster conditions. In Comfort L (ed.): Managing Disasters: Strategies and Policy Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988: 255-327.

National Flood Insurance Program: National Flood Insurance Program. Available at http://www.floodsmart.gov/floodsmart/. Accessed September 8, 2010.

Sarewitz D, Pielke R, Keydhah M: Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(4): 805-810.

Sobel R, Leeson P: Government’s response to hurricane Katrina: A public choice analysis. Public Choice. 2006; 127: 55-73.

Garret T, Sobel R: The political economy of FEMA disaster payment. Econ Inq. 2003; 41(3): 496-509.

Greenberg G, Miller J, Mohr L, et al.: Developing public policy theory: Perspectives from empirical research. In McCool D (ed.): Public Policy Theories, Models and Concepts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000: 204-206.

Gerber B: Disaster management in the United States: Examining key political and policy changes. Policy Stud J. 2007; 35(2): 227-238.

Wilson JQ: Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

Davis M: Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York: Vintage Books, 1999.

Birkland T: Disasters, catastrophes and policy failure in the homeland security era. Rev Policy Res. 2009; 26(4): 423-438.

EM-DAT: International Disaster Database. The OFDA/CRED. Available at http://www.emdat.be/. Accessed November 23, 2007.

Thacker MTF, Lee R, Sabogal RI, et al.: Overview of deaths associated with natural events, United States 1979-2004. Disasters. 2008; 32(2): 303-315.

Borden KA, Cutter SL: Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States. Int J Health Geogr. 2008; 7: 64.

Platt R: Disasters and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events.Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.

United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction: Number of natural disasters registered in EM-DAT, 1900-2005. Available at http://www.unisdr.org/disaster-statistics/introduction. htm. Accessed September 8, 2010.

BureauNet National Flood Insurance Program: Claim information by States, 1950-2007. Available at http://bsa.nfipstat.com/reports/reports.html. Accessed June 22, 2009.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Declared disasters by year and state. Available at http://www.fema.gov/ news/disaster_totals_annual.fema. Accessed September 8, 2010.

Stone D: Causal stories and formation of policy agendas. Pol Sci Q. 1989; 104(2): 281-300.

Loimer H, Driur M, Guarnieri M: Accidents and acts of God: A history of the terms. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86(1): 101-107.

Montagne R: People and places: Remembering the 1906 San Francisco earthquake; April 11, 2006. Available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5334411. Accessed September 8, 2010.

Frank N: The great Galveston hurricane of 1900. In Simpson R, Anten R, Garstang M (eds.): Hurricane! Coping with Disaster. Vol. 55.Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 2004: 360.

Greenberg D: Help! Call the White House. Available at http://www.slate.com/id/2149008/. Accessed September 8, 2010.

Sylves R: U.S. disaster policy and management in an era of homeland security. In McEntire D (ed.): Disciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, 2007: 142-160.

McCarthy TX: FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process: A Primer. Congressional Research Service, RL3146. Available at http:// pencrs.com/document/RL34146/2010-03-18/. Accessed November 27, 2010.

Schmidtlein M, Finsh C, Cutter S: Disaster declarations and major hazard occurrences in the United States. Prof Geogr. 2008; 60(1): 1-14.

National Council on Disability (NCD): Saving Lives: Including People with Disabilities in Emergency Planning. Washington, DC: NCD, 2005.

Weimer D, Vining A: Rationales for public policy: Market failures. In Weimer D, Vining A (eds.): Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004: 74-115.

Lehrer E: Reforming the National Flood Insurance Program After 35 Years of Failure.Washington, DC: Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2008.

Dehring C: Building codes and land values in high hazard areas. Land Econ. 2006; 82(4): 513-528.

Sutter D: Ensuring Disaster: State Insurance Regulation, Coastal Development, and Hurricanes. Arlington, VA: George Mason University, Mercatus Center, 2007.

Natural Hazards Center: FEMA looks to wrap up Katrina disputes and keep down future costs. Disaster Research 529. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center, 2009.

Bin O, Polasky S: Effects of flood hazards on property values: Evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Econ. 2004; 80(4): 490-500.

Chivers J, Flores NE: Market failure in information: The National Flood Insurance Program. Land Econ. 2002; 78(4): 515-521.

Ganderton P, Brookshire D, MeKee M, et al.: Buying insurance for disaser-type risks: Experimental evidence. J Risk Uncertain. 2000; 20(3): 271-289.

Kunreuther H, Pauly M: Neglecting disaster: Why don’t people insure against large losses? J Risk Uncertain. 2004; 28(1): 5-21.

US Census Bureau: Consolidated Federal Funds Report 2003-2008. Available at http://www.census.gov/govs/cffs/historical_data.html. Accessed November 29, 2009.

Iceland J, Weinberg D, Steinmetz E: Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in the United States: 1980-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2002.

U.S. Bureau of the Census: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplements. Available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html. Accessed June 22, 2009.

Reeves A: Plucking votes from disasters. Available at http://articles.latimes.com/2004/may/12/opinion/oe-reeves12. Accessed December 7, 2009.

May P: Reconsidering policy designs: Policies and publics. J Public Policy. 1990; 11(2): 187-206.

Rabinowitz G: The power of the states in US presidential elections. Am Pol Sci Rev. 1986; 80(1): 65-87.

Nohrstedt D: The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Policy Stud J. 2008; 36(2): 257-278.

Godwin M, Schroedel J: Policy diffusion and strategies for promoting policy change: Evidence from California local gun control ordinances. Policy Stud J. 2005; 28(4): 760-776.

Schneider A, Ingram H: How the social construction of target populations contribute to problems in policy design. Policy Curr. 1993; 3(1): 1-4.

Wilson J, Taub RP: There Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic and Class Tensions in Four Chicago Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knoff, 2006.

Massey DS, Denton NA: American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Wilson W: The black community in the 1980’s: Questions of race, class, and public policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1981; 454: 26-37.

Wilson JQ, Dilulio JJ: American Government, Institutions and Policies. Lexington, DC: Heath & Company, 1975.

Richardson M, Levine P: Access to primary care for persons with disabilities living in rural areas. AHSF FHSR Annu Meet Abstr Book. 1995; 12: 16.

Fox M, White G, Ronney C, et al.: Disaster preparedness and response for persons with mobility impairments. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2007; 17(4): 196-205.

Hartman C, Squires G: There Is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster: Race, Class and Hurricane Katrina. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006.

Lakoff G: Metaphor, morality and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Soc Res. 1995; 62(2): 177-213.

Perez E, Thompson P: Natural hazards: Causes and effects: Lesson I—Introduction to natural hazards. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994; 9(1): 80-87.

Lowi T: Four systems of policy, politics and choice. In McCool D (ed.): Public Policy Theories Models and Concepts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995: 181-200.

Burby R: Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2006; 604(1): 171-191.

Schifrin N, Karl J: Myanmar’s leaders play politics with disaster. ABC News. Available at http://abcnews.go.com/International/ story?id=4818210&page=1. Accessed September 8, 2010.