Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Conservation districts and emergency management: New partners for tight fiscal times

Jason Weinerman, MPA

Abstract


Declining state budgets and pressure on the federal budget are likely to leave local emergency management efforts in a precarious position. During these challenging times, all government agencies will need to reach out and establish new partnerships to accomplish their missions. Emergency management situations, such as blizzards, fire, floods, and drought, are likely to originate in rural areas, and finding a partner who has a good working relationship with rural landowners is critical. Conservation districts are special- purpose government units that have a long history of working with rural landowners and getting active management installed on the ground. In addition, conservation districts have existing partnerships with other state and federal agencies, which can bring additional financial resources into the emergency management arena in a multipurpose framework. Although conservation districts are unlikely to be able to work in preparation and response planning, they can provide valuable assistance in mitigation and recovery operations. By including these special-purpose units of government in the emergency management planning and implementation efforts, emergency managers can extend their reach while not having to add additional resources.

Keywords


emergency management, conservation districts, partners, rural landowners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Minnesota Climatology Working Group: Rainfall totals for southern Minnesota—August 18 through August 20 (8:00 AM CDT), 2007. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/flash_floods/ff070820.htm. Accessed October 9, 2010.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Fundamentals of Emergency Management [e-book]. Available at http://www.training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/fem.asp. Accessed July 8, 2010.

National Association of Conservation Districts: About conservation districts. Available at http://www.nacdnet.org/about/districts/index.phtml. Accessed July 10, 2010.

Helms D: Two centuries of soil conservation. OAH Magazine of History. 1991; 5(3): 24-28.

Minnesota Department of Transportation: Analysis of snow climatology. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/snow_fence/. Accessed July 9, 2010.

Natural Resources Conservation Service: CRP Practice CP17A Living Snow Fence.Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2007.

Josiah S, Majeski M: Living snow fences. Center for Integrated Natural Resource and Agricultural Management, University of Minnesota Extension. Available at http://www.extension.umn.edu/ distribution/naturalresources/DD7277.html. Accessed July 8, 2010.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: What is meant by the term drought? Available at http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/fgz/science/drought.php?wfo=fgz. Accessed July 15, 2010.

Skilling T: No rainy nights in Georgia: The evolution of the great American drought. Chicago Tribune, November 18, 2007: A13.

Egan T: The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dustbowl. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co., 2006.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Floods. Available at http://www.fema.gov/hazard/flood/index.shtm. Accessed July 10, 2010.

Wiskow E, van der Ploeg R: Calculation of drain spacings for optimal rainstorm flood control. J Hydrol. 2003; 272(1-4): 163.

TeKrony R, Sanders G, Cummins B: History of drainage in the Bureau of Reclamation. J Irrigation Drainage Eng. 2004; 130(2): 148-153.

Rosgen DL: Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hyrdology, 1996.

Natural Resources Conservation Service:Wetlands reserve program. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Programs/wrp/. Accessed June 18, 2010.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:Wetland easements. Available at http://www.fws.gov/lostwood/easements.htm. Accessed June 10, 2010.

Montgomery DR: Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104(33): 13268-13272.

Natural Resources Conservation Service: Buffer strips: Common sense conservation. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/feature/buffers/. Accessed July 10, 2010.

Dickson T: Gardens for a rainy day. Minnesota Conservation Volunteer. Available at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/volunteer/mayjun04/raingardens.html. Accessed July 13, 2010.

Meryhew R, Collins T, Shah A: 6 reported dead in floods in southeast Minnesota. StarTribune; August 20, 2007. Available at http://www.startribune.com/local/11606216.html. Accessed July 18, 2010.

National Interagency Coordination Center: Wildland Fire Summary Statistics Annual Report 2009. Available at http://www. predictiveservices.nifc.gov/intelligence/2009_statssumm/2009Stats &Summ.html. Accessed July 13, 2010.

National Fire Protection Association: About firewise. Available at http://www.firewise.org/. Accessed July 13, 2010.

National Association of Conservation Districts: Conservation districts’ role in implementing the national fire plan: A second look. Available at http://www.nacdnet.org/resources/reports/fire_plan.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2010.

National Association of Conservation Districts: Forestry. Available at http://www.nacdnet.org/policy/naturalresources/forestry/. Accessed July 12, 2010.

North Dakota Forest Service: Wildfire protection. Available at http://www.ndsu.edu/ndfs/forestry/rural_forestry/. Accessed July 14, 2010.

Cannon S, Gartner J, Rupert M, et al.: Predicting the probability and volume of postwildfire debris flows in the intermountain western United States. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2010; 122(1/2): 127-144.

van Ruijven J, Berendse F: Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought. J Ecol. 2010; 98(1): 81-86.

Bruelheide H, Luginbühl U: Peeking at ecosystem stability: Making use of a natural disturbance experiment to analyze resistance and resilience. Ecology. 2009; 90(5): 1314-1325.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2011.0055

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Emergency Management