

Crisis preparation, media use, and information seeking: Patterns across Katrina evacuees and lessons learned for crisis communication
Abstract
Keywords
References
Seeger MW, Sellnow T, Ulmer RR: Communication and Organizational Crisis.Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
Coombs WT: Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding. London: Sage, 1999.
Sellnow T, Seeger M, Ulmer RR: Chaos theory, informational needs and the North Dakota floods. J Appl Commun Res. 2002; 30: 269-292.
Kreps GA: Sociological inquiry and disaster research. In Turner RE, Short JF Jr (eds.): Annual Review of Sociology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1984: 309-330.
Quarantelli EL: Disasters: Theory and Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1978.
Helsloot I, Ruitenberg A: Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and some practical implications. J Conting Crisis Manage. 2004; 12: 98-110.
Tierney KJ: The social and community contexts of disaster. In Gist R, Lubin R (eds.): Psychosocial Aspects of Disaster. New York: Wiley, 1989: 11-39.
Taylor SM, Hall FL: Residential planning implications of subjective response to noise: Some empirical findings. In Suedfeld P, Russell J (eds.): Behavioral Basis of Design. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, 1976: 172-179.
Burstein JL: The myths of disaster education. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47: 50-52.
Brashers DE, Neidig JL, Haas SM, et al.: Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Commun Monograph. 2000; 67: 63-84.
Murch AW: Public concern for environmental pollution. Public Opin Quart. 1971; 35: 100-106.
Heath RL, Liao S, Douglas W: Effects of perceived economic harms and benefits on issue involvement, information use and action: A study in risk communication. J Public Relat Res. 1995; 7: 89-109.
Perse E, Signorielli N, Courtright J, et al.: Public perceptions of media functions at the beginning of the war on terrorism. In Greenberg BS (ed.), Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002: 39-52.
Weick K: Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
Seeger MW, Vennette S, Ulmer RR, et al.: Media use, information seeking, and reported needs in post crisis contexts. In Greenberg BS (ed.): Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, 2002: 53-63.
Perry RW, Mushkatel AH: Minority Citizens in Disasters. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1986.
Gladwin H, Peacock WG: Warning and evacuation: A night for hard houses. In Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds.): Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge, 1997: 52-74.
Fitzpatrick C, Mileti DS: Public risk communication. In Dynes RR, Tierney KJ (eds.): Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press, 1994: 73-75.
Greenberg BS, Hofschire L, Lachlin K: Diffusion, media use and interpersonal communication behaviors. In Greenberg BS (ed.): Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, 2002: 3-16.
Bracken CC, Jeffres L, Neuendorf KA, et al.: How cosmopolites react to messages: America under attack. Commun Res Rep. 2005; 22: 47-58.
Deutschman PJ, Danielson WA: Diffusion of knowledge of a major news story. J Quart. 1960; 37: 345-355.
Greenberg BS: Diffusion of news of the Kennedy assassination. Public Opin Quart. 1964; 28: 225-231.
Spitzer SP, Spitzer NS: Diffusion of the news of the Kennedy and Oswald deaths. In Greenberg BS, Parker EB (eds.): The Kennedy Assassination and the American Public: Social Communications in Crisis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1965: 99-111.
Spence PR, Westerman D, Skalski P, et al.: Gender and age effects on information seeking after 9/11. Commun Res Rep. 2006; 23: 217-223.
Kepplinger HM, Brosius HB, Staab J, et al.: instrumentelle Aktualisierung. grundlagen einer theorie publizistischer konflikte (instrumental Actualization. fundamentals of a theory of publicistic conflicts). In Kasse M, Shulz W (eds.): Massenkommunikation. Theorien, Methoden, Befunde.Wiesbaden, Germany:Westdeutscher Verlag, 1989.
Quarantelli EL: Evacuation Behavior and Problems: Findings and Implications from the Research Literature. Disaster Research Center, Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 1980.
Perry RW: Evacuation decision-making in natural disasters. Mass Emerg. 1979; 4: 25-38.
United States Census Bureau, 2000. http://www.census.gov/
Segura EN, Meertens D: ‘Lo Que Dejan Las Guerras’ (The aftermath of war), in Vidas sin Violencia: Nuevasvoces, Nuevos Desafíos (Living Without Violence: New Voices, New Challenges), Santiago de Chile: ISIS Internacional, 1998.
Burby R, Strong D: Coping with chemicals: Blacks, whites, planners, and industrial pollution. J Am Plann Assoc. 1997; 63: 469-480.
Ruggiero T, Glascock J: Tracking media use and gratifications. In Greenberg BS (ed.): Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002: 65-74.
Roberts DF, Foehr UG, Rideout VJ, et al.: Kids and Media @ the New Millennium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1999.
Stanger JD, Jamieson KH: Television in the Home: The Third Annual National Survey of Parents and Children (Report Series No. 4). Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, 1998.
Wolshon B: Planning for the evacuation of New Orleans. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal. Available at www.ite.org/itejournal/index.asp. Accessed February 10, 2006.
Bem SL: Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev. 1981; 88: 354-364.
Bortz SA: Innate Brain Differences Between Men and Women and How it Effects Their Interaction With the Internet. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. 28: United States Census Bureau, 2000. http://www.census.gov/
Burgoon M, Dillard JP, Doran NE: Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations by males and females. Human Commun Res. 1983; 10: 283-294.
Cherny L, Weiss ER: Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace. Seattle,WA: Seal Press, 1996.
Burgoon M, Dillard JP, Doran NE: Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations by males and females. Human Communication Research. 1983; 10: 283-294.
Desmond RJ, Hirsch B, Singer D, et al.: Gender differences, mediation, and disciplinary styles in children’s responses to television. Sex Roles. 1987; 16: 375-389.
Eagly AH: Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Earlbaum, 1987.
Jacklin CN, Maccoby EE: Social behavior at 33 months in samesex and mixed-sex dyads. Child Dev. 1978; 49: 557-569.
Messaris P, Kerr D: Mothers’ comments about TV: Relation to family communication patterns. Commun Res. 1983; 10: 175-194.
Messaris P, Sarett C: On the consequences of television-related parent-child interactions. Human Commun Res. 1981; 7: 226-244.
Morgan M: Television, sex-role attitudes, and sex-role behavior. J Early Adolesc. 1987; 7: 269-282.
Mosher DL: Sex differences, sex experience, sex guilt, and explicitly sexual films. J Soc Issues. 1973; 29: 95-112.
Perse E, Nathanson AI, McLeod DM: Effects of spokesperson sex, public announcement appeal, and involvement on evaluations of same-sex PSAs. Health Commun. 1996; 8: 171-189.
Schmitt BH, LeClerc F, Dube-Rioux L: Sex typing and consumer behavior: A test of gender schema theory. J Consumer Res. 1988; 15: 122-128.
Schuck SZ, Schuck E, Hallam F, et al.: Sex differences and aggressive behavior subsequent to listening to a radio broadcast of violence. Psychol Rep. 1971; 28: 931-936.
Signorielli N: Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles. 1989; 21: 341-360.
Ross L, Anderson DR,Wisocki PA: Television viewing and adult sex-role attitudes. Sex Roles. 1982; 8: 589-592.
Terry J, Calvert M: Processed Lives: Gender and Technology in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Brody LR, Hall JA: Gender, emotion, and expression. In M Lewis, JM Haviland-Jones (eds.): Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford Press. 2000: 338-349.
Hoffner C, Fujioka Y, Ibrahim, Ye, J: Emotion and coping with terror. In BS Greenberg (ed.): Communication and terrorism. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc. 2002: 229-244.
Baukus RA, Strohm SM: Gender differences in perceptions of media reports of the Gulf and Afghan conflicts. In Greenberg BS (ed.): Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002: 275-288.
Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al.: Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley, 2004.
Spence PR,Westerman D, Skalski P, et al.: Proxemic effects on information seeking following the 9/11 attacks. Commun Res Rep. 2005; 22: 39-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2008.0009
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Emergency Management