Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Strategies for resilience: A qualitative analysis of rural community leaders’ advice on disaster recovery

George A. Youngs, Jr., PhD, H. Katherine O’Neill, PhD

Abstract


Resilience refers to the capacity to withstand, overcome, or recover from serious threat, such as a natural disaster. In small towns, community leaders are intimately involved with their towns’ response and recovery from a disaster and can see resilience processes, or their absence, virtually one person at a time. The authors interviewed 30 community leaders in two small towns along the Red River of the North, 7 to 8 years after a devastating flood. Responses to the question, “Based on your experience and observations (in your community), what advice would you give a similar community that was trying to recover from a major flood?” revealed a pattern of suggestions consistent with resilience strategies identified in the psychological literature. Specifically, the strategies of taking action, accepting help from others, engaging in self-discovery, maintaining a realistic long-term perspective, and fostering hope and optimism were mentioned repeatedly by the respondents. The authors also found rich subthemes within each of these general strategies. These findings support the applicability of psychological resilience strategies to a community’s disaster response and recovery processes.

Keywords


resilience, recovery, leaders, rural

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hobfoll SE, Freedy JR, Green BL, et al.: Coping in reaction to extreme stress: The roles of resource loss and resource availability. In Zeidner M, Endler NS (eds.): Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, and Applications. Oxford, England:Wiley, 1996: 322-349.

American Psychological Association: The Road to Resilience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002.

Masten AS: Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001; 56(3): 227-238.

Richardson GE: The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. J Clin Psychol. 2002; 58(3): 307-321.

Sonn CC, Fisher AT: Sense of community: Community resilient responses to oppressions and change. J Community Psychol. 1988; 26(5): 457-472.

Wolkow KI, Ferguson HB: Community factors in the development of resiliency: Considerations and future directions. Community Ment Health J. 2001; 37: 489-498.

Cutrona CE, Russell D: Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Price GR (eds.): Social Support: An Interactional View. New York: Wiley, 1990: 319-366.

Echterling LG, Bradfield C, Wylie ML: Responses of urban and rural ministers to a natural disaster. J Rural Community Psychol. 1988; 9: 36-46.

Rubin CB, Saperstein MD, Barbee DG: Community Recovery from a Major Natural Disaster. Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph 41. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science, 1985: 15-34.

Hobfoll SE, Briggs S,Wells J: Community stress and resources: Actions and reactions. In Hobfoll SE, deVries MW (eds.): Extreme Stress and Communities: Impact and Intervention. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1995: 137-158.

Silverman WK, LaGreca AM: Children experiencing disasters: Definitions, reactions, and predictors of outcomes. In LaGreca AM, Silverman WK,Vernberg EM, et al. (eds.): Helping Children Cope with Disasters and Terrorism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002: 11-34.

Arata CM, Picou JS, Johnson GD, et al.: Coping with technological disaster: An application of the conservation of resoureces model to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. J Trauma Stress. 2000; 13: 23-39.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2008.0040

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Emergency Management