The general use of outdoor warning sirens: A preliminary survey of emergency managers

Authors

  • Jerald A. Brotzge, PhD
  • William R. Donner, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2015.0218

Keywords:

outdoor warning sirens, tornadoes, warning technology

Abstract

With more direct, personal warning systems becoming popular, the continued maintenance of older warning systems, such as outdoor warning sirens, may be jeopardized as emergency managers (EMs) seek to optimize their limited budgets. However, the extent to which sirens are embedded into the American landscape and culture argues against their removal. To better quantify the distribution and use of outdoor warning sirens, an international survey of EMs was conducted to learn more about where siren systems are deployed and how they are operated. Approximately 593 respondents started the 31 question survey with 383 completing it. Questions were asked regarding siren network size, alternative warning systems, siren use and capabilities, and testing. For those without sirens, a series of questions were asked for why sirens were not used. In general, a lack of perceived threat, high costs, and large geographic area kept some jurisdictions from installing sirens. Of those that operate siren networks, half of networks are small (≤10 sirens), while a small percentage of jurisdictions (6.3 percent) operate very large networks (>100). A large majority of respondents expected to maintain or expand their networks within the next 5 years. Three-quarters of respondents use additional warning systems. Nearly half of respondents use sirens for nonweather applications, and nearly two-thirds have the capability to use multiple sound alerts. Overall, sirens remain a popular tool for warning on a variety of local hazards though how the sirens are operated and tested vary widely by jurisdiction.

Author Biographies

Jerald A. Brotzge, PhD

Program Manager, New York State Mesonet, Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.

William R. Donner, PhD

Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Texas-Pan American, Edinburg, Texas.

 

References

Casteel MA, Downing JR: How individuals process NWS weather warning messages on their cell phones. Weather Climate Soc. 2013; 5: 254-265.

Brotzge J, Donner W: General policy for activating outdoor warning siren systems for severe weather: Survey of emergency managers. Nat Hazard Rev. 2014: 04014020. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) NH.1527-6996.0000155.

Coleman TA, Knupp KR, Spann J, et al.: The history (and future) of tornado warning dissemination in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2011; 92(5): 567-582.

League C, Díaz W, Philips B, et al.: Emergency manager decision-making and tornado warning communication. Meteorol Appl. 2000; 17: 163-172.

Sherman-Morris K: Tornado warning dissemination and response at a university campus. Nat Hazards. 2010; 52: 623-638.

Balluz L, Schieve L, Holmes T, et al.: Predictors for people's response to a tornado warning: Arkansas, 1 March 1997. Disasters. 2000; 24: 71-77.

Liu S, Quenemoen L, Malilay J, et al.: Assessment of a severeweather warning system and disaster preparedness, Calhoun County, Alabama, 1994. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 87-89.

Tierney K: Chemical Emergencies, Offsite Exposures and Organizational Response. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1987.

Baron R, Etzel RA, Sanderson LM: Surveillance for adverse health effects following a chemical release in West Virginia. Disasters. 1988; 12: 356-365.

Brotzge J, Donner W: The tornado warning process: A review of current research, challenges, and opportunities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2013; 94: 1715-1733.

University of Florida: Radiological accidents. In The Disaster Handbook. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 2008: 4; chap 12. Available at http://disaster.ifas.ufl.edu/PDFS/CHAP12/D12-06.PDF. Accessed August 8, 2014.

Holt M, Andrews A: Nuclear Power Plant Security and Vulnerabilities. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2012.

Mileti DS, Fitzpatrick C: Causal sequence of risk communication in the Parkfield earthquake prediction experiment. Risk Anal. 1992; 12: 393-400.

Mileti DS, Darlington JD: Societal response to revised earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1995; 13: 119-145.

Sentry Sirens: Storm Sentry software page. Available at http://www.sentrysiren.com/system-control-software/storm-sentry/. Accessed August 8, 2014.

Published

02/25/2016

How to Cite

Brotzge, PhD, J. A., and W. R. Donner, PhD. “The General Use of Outdoor Warning Sirens: A Preliminary Survey of Emergency Managers”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2016, pp. 61-69, doi:10.5055/jem.2015.0218.