Transition from response to recovery after the Lancaster, TX, tornado: An empirical description

Authors

  • David M. Neal, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2004.0011

Keywords:

-

Abstract

Disaster researchers and disaster managers have relied upon various depictions of disaster phases for their professional activities, but there has been little empirical examination of these phases. This paper looks at when response activities started and ended and when recovery efforts began following a tornado. The data indicate that the transition from response to recovery is not a discrete event; rather, soon after response activities were initiated within the community, recovery efforts were also started. Although disaster phases provide an effective way to organize data and actual events, they need much further empirical and theoretical examination if they are to be an important component of disaster research and disaster management.

Author Biography

David M. Neal, PhD

Professor and associate director for the Institute for Emergency Preparedness at Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, Alabama.

References

Carr L: Disaster and the sequence-pattern concept of social change. American Journal of Sociology. 1932; 38: 207-218.

Powell JW: An Introduction to the Natural History of Disaster. Baltimore: University of Maryland Disaster Research Report, 1954.

Stoddard E: Conceptual Models of Human Behavior in Disaster. El Paso: Texas Western Press, 1968.

Dynes RR: Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books, 1970.

Mileti D, Drabek T, Haas JE: Human Systems in Extreme Environ ments. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, The Uni versity of Colorado, 1975.

Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR: Response to social crisis and disaster. Ann Rev Sociology. 1977; 3: 23-49.

Kreps GA: Sociological inquiry and disaster research. Ann Rev Sociology. 1977; 10: 309-30.

Drabek T: Human Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Kates RW, Pijawka D: From rubble to monument: The pace of reconstruction. In Haas JE, Kates RW, Bowdon MJ: Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1977, 1-23.

Bolin R: Long-Term Family Recovery from Disaster. Program on Environment and Behavior, Monograph #36, Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado, 1982.

Quarantelli EL: Sheltering and Housing after Major Com munity Disasters: Case Studies and General Observations. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 1982.

Phillips BD: Post-Disaster Sheltering and Housing of Hispanics, the Elderly and the Homeless. Final Project Report to the National Science Foundation. Dallas, Texas: Southern Methodist University, Department of Sociology, 1991.

National Governor’s Association: Emergency Preparedness Project Final Report. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1979. 14. Neal DM: Reconsidering the phases of disaster. Int J Mass Emergencies and Disasters. 1997; 15(2): 239-264.

Downloads

Published

01/01/2004

How to Cite

Neal, PhD, D. M. “Transition from Response to Recovery After the Lancaster, TX, Tornado: An Empirical Description”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 47-51, doi:10.5055/jem.2004.0011.

Issue

Section

Articles