Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Family physicians’ proficiency in urine drug test interpretation

Gary M. Reisfield, MD, Fern J. Webb, PhD, Roger L. Bertholf, PhD, Paul A. Sloan, MD, George R. Wilson, MD

Abstract


Objective: To determine the proficiency in urine drug test interpretation among family medicine physicians who order these tests to monitor adherence in their patients on chronic opioid therapy.
Methods: A seven-question instrument, consisting of six, five-option, single-best-answer multiple choice questions and one yes/no question was administered to 80 family medicine physicians attending a University of Kentucky Family Medicine Review Course. We calculated frequencies and performed χ2 analyses to examine bivariate associations between urine drug test utilization and interpretive knowledge.
Results: The instrument was completed by 60/80 (75 percent) of eligible physicians (44 order urine drug testing; 16 do not). None of the physicians who order urine drug testing answered more than five of the seven questions correctly, and only 20 percent answered more than half correctly. Physicians who order urine drug testing performed better than physicians who do not order urine drug testing on only four of the seven questions, although there were no statistically significant differences between the groups on any question.
Conclusions: Family medicine physicians who order urine drug testing to monitor their patients on chronic opioid therapy are not proficient in their interpretation. This study highlights the need for improved physician education in this area. It is imperative for physicians to work closely with certified laboratory professionals when ordering and interpreting urine drug tests.

Keywords


urine drug test, opioid, drug abuse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Magni G, Marchetti M, Moreschi C, et al.: Chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms in the National Health and Nutrition Examination. I. Epidemiologic follow-up study. Pain. 1993; 53: 163-168.

Burt CW, Schappert SM: Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1999-2000. Vital Health Stat. 2004; 13: 1-70.

Caudill-Slosberg MA, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S: Office visits and analgesic prescriptions for musculoskeletal pain in US: 1980 vs. 2000. Pain. 2004; 109: 514-519.

Moskowitz M: Advances in understanding chronic pain: Mechanisms of pain modulation and relationship to treatment. Neurology. 2002; 59(5, suppl 2): S1.

American Board of Pain Medicine: 2007 Bulletin of Information. Available at www.abpm.org/faq/index.html. Accessed September 12, 2007.

Gilson AM, Ryan KM, Joranson DE, et al.: A reassessment of trends in the medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics and implications for diversion control: 1997-2002. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 28(2): 176-188.

Clark JD: Chronic pain prevalence and analgesic prescribing in a general medical population. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002; 23(2): 131-137.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: 2006 National Survey on Drug Use & Health: National Results. Available at www.oas.samhsa.gov.nsduh/2k6nsduh/2k6Results.cfm#1.2. Accessed September 12, 2007.

Robinson RC, Gatchel RJ, Polatin P, et al.: Screening for problematic prescription opioid use. Clin J Pain. 2001; 17: 220-228.

Olsen Y, Daumit GL: Opioid prescribing for chronic nonmalignant pain in primary care: Challenges and solutions. Adv Psychosom Med. 2004; 25: 138-150.

Potter M, Schafer S, Gonzalez-Mendez E, et al.: Opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50(2): 145-151.

Ponte CD, Johnson-Tribino J: Attitudes and knowledge about pain: An assessment of West Virginia family physicians. Fam Med. 2005; 37(7): 477-480.

Reid MC, Engles-Horton LL, Weber MB, et al.: Use of opioid medications for chronic noncancer pain syndromes in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 173-179.

Chelminski PR, Ives TJ, Felix KM, et al.: A primary care, multi-disciplinary disease management program for opioidtreated patients with chronic non-cancer pain and high burden of psychiatric co-morbidity. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005; 5(1): 3.

Fishman SM, Bandman TB, Edwards A, et al.: The opioid contract in the management of chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999; 18: 27-37.

Pembrook L: Opioid renewal clinic reduces unscheduled office visits. Anesthesiol News. 2006; 32: 17-18.

Reisfield GM, Bertholf R, Barkin RL, et al.: Urine drug test interpretation: What do physicians know? J Opioid Manage. 2007; 3(2): 80-86.

Levy S, Harris SK, Sherritt L, et al.: Drug testing of adolescents in ambulatory medicine: Physician practices and knowledge. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160(2): 146-150.

Durback LF, Scharman EJ, Brown BS: Emergency physicians’ perceptions of drug screens at their own hospitals. Vet Human Toxicol. 1998; 40(4): 234-237.

Reisfield GM, Salazar E, Bertholf RL: Rational use and interpretation of urine drug testing in chronic opioid therapy. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2007; 37(4): 301-314.

Lee H-K, Lewis LD, Tsongalis GJ, et al.: Negative urine opioid screening caused by rifampin-mediated induction of oxycodone hepatic metabolism. Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 367: 196-200.

Aklillu E, Persson I, Bertilsson L, et al.: Frequent distribution of ultrarapid metabolizers of debrisoquine in an Ethiopian population carrying duplicated and multiduplicated functional CYP2D6 alleles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996; 278: 441-446.

McLellan RA, Oscarson M, Seidegard J, et al.: Frequent occurrence of CYP2D6 gene duplication in Saudi Arabians. Pharmacogenetics. 1997; 7: 187-191.

Gourlay D, Heit HA, Caplan YH: Urine Drug Testing in Primary Care: Dispelling the Myths and Designing Strategies. San Francisco: California Academy of Family Physicians, PharmaCom Group, 2002. Available at www.familydocs.org/files/UDTmonograph.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2007.

Medical Review Officer Certification Council: Available at www.mrocc.com. Accessed September 20, 2007.

American Association of Medical Review Officers: Available at www.aamro.com. Accessed September 20, 2007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2007.0022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.