Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Medical resource use and costs among pain patients with potential opioid-tolerability issues

Noam Y. Kirson, PhD, Amie Shei, PhD, Howard G. Birnbaum, PhD, Rami Ben-Joseph, PhD, Edward Michna, MD

Abstract


Objective: To estimate excess medical resource use and costs associated with prescription opioid (RxO) tolerability issues.

Design: This was an observational, retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative claims data.

Setting: The study included commercially insured patients treated in different healthcare settings captured in the Truven MarketScan claims database.

Patients: Patients aged 18-64 years initiating treatment with an RxO (index) and continuously treated with pain relievers over a 6-month period were selected. “Switchers” were patients who discontinued their index RxO and switched to non-RxO pain relievers <30 days post-index, and whose last pain reliever in the 6-month follow-up period was not an RxO. Such switching was considered a proxy for RxO-tolerability issues. “Continuous RxO users” were patients who remained on the index RxO for the follow-up period. Switchers and continuous RxO users were matched 1:1 on propensity score, baseline medical costs, index RxO days supply, and short-/long-acting index RxO.

Main Outcome Measures: Six-month follow-up medical resource use and costs were compared between matched switchers and continuous RxO users.

Results: A total of 10,704 pairs of switchers and continuous RxO users were matched. In the 6-month follow-up period, switchers had more outpatient (7.5 vs 6.8; p < 0.001) and inpatient (0.05 vs 0.04; p = 0.002) visits and longer inpatient stays (0.26 days vs 0.19; p = 0.006) compared to continuous RxO users. Switchers also had higher total medical costs ($4,522 vs $3,657; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Switchers incur greater medical resource use and costs than similar patients continuously treated with their index RxO.

 


Keywords


opioids, tolerability, side effects

Full Text:

PDF

References


IOM (Institute of Medicine): Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, et al.: Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA. 2003; 290(18): 2443-2454.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for industry. Abuse-deterrent opioids—Evaluation and labeling. Draft guidance, January 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM334743.pdf. Accessed February 2013.

Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al.: Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008; 11(2 Suppl): S105-S120.

Iyer S, Davis KL, Candrilli S: Opioid use patterns and health care resource utilization in patients prescribed opioid therapy with and without constipation. Manag Care. 2010; 19(3): 44-51.

Ivanova JI, Birnbaum HG, Yushkina Y, et al.: The prevalence and economic impact of prescription opioid-related side effects among patients with chronic noncancer pain. J Opioid Manag. 2013; 9(4): 239-254.

Gregorian RS Jr, Gasik A, Kwong WJ, et al.: Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: A trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010; 11(11): 1095-1108.

Boswell K, Kwong WJ, Kavanagh S: Burden of opioid-associated gastrointestinal side effects from clinical and economic perspectives: A systematic literature review. J Opioid Manag. 2010; 6(4): 269-289.

Truven Health Analytics: MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Research Databases. Ann Arbor, MI: Truven Health Analytics, 2008: 12.

Hess B, Bernardi M, Klotz HP: Attitude of Swiss physicians towards opioid-induced constipation: A national survey. Eur J Intern Med. 2011; 22(5): 527-531.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2014.0220

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.