Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Assessment of the use of oral fluid as a matrix for drug monitoring in patients undergoing treatment for opioid addiction

Frank Kunkel, MD, Elizabeth Fey, MS, Damon Borg, PhD, Richard Stripp, PhD, Christine Getto, BS

Abstract


Drug testing is an important clinical tool that is available to physicians who are assessing the effectiveness of drug treatment as well as patient compliance to the administered program. While urine has traditionally been the matrix of choice for drug monitoring, oral fluid, a filtrate of the blood, has shown great promise as an alternative matrix for such applications. Oral fluid collection can be accomplished without the need for highly trained medical staff through the use of a simple, noninvasive oral fluid collection device, which obtains an adequate sample in only a few minutes. There has been a significant amount of research performed on the use of oral fluid for forensic toxicology application; however, more studies assessing the use of oral fluid drug testing are required to validate its ability to achieve clinical drug monitoring goals. Testing for various drugs in oral fluid may yield a different result when compared to the same drugs in urine, requiring an assessment of the utility of oral fluid for such practices. The purpose of this study was to examine the application of oral fluid drug testing in patients undergoing buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. A retrospective analysis of drug testing results obtained from 6,928 patients (4,560 unobserved urine collections and 2,368 observed oral fluid collections) monitored for heroin metabolite, amphetamine, benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, tetrahydrocannabinol, cocaine, codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone was completed. Results of this statistical exercise indicated that patients undergoing observed oral fluid collection tested positive more frequently than those unobserved urine collections for several illicit drugs and prescription medications targeted. Oral fluid was shown to detect illicit drug use as well as noncompliance in this patient population under the studied conditions more often than the urine specimens.


Keywords


oral fluid drug testing, opioid addiction, suboxone, buprenorphine, urine drug testing

Full Text:

PDF

References


De Giovanni N, Fucci N: The state of the art on the use of oral fluid as alternative specimen in forensic toxicology. Curr Pharm Anal. 2008; 4: 258-273.

Choo R, Huestis M: Oral fluid as a diagnostic tool. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004; 42(11): 1273-1287.

Bosker W, Huestis M: Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse. Clin Chem. 2009; 55: 1910-1931.

Heltsley R, DePriest A, Black D, et al.: Oral fluid drug testing of chronic pain patients. I. Positive prevalence rates of licit and illicit drugs. J Anal Toxicol. 2011; 35: 529-540.

Cone E, Clarke J, Tsanaclis L: Prevalence and disposition of drugs of abuse and opioid treatment drugs in oral fluid. J Anal Toxicol. 2007; 31: 424-433.

Crouch D, et al.: Evaluation of saliva/oral fluid as an alternative drug testing specimen. NIJ Rep. 2005; 605-03: 1-70.

Conermann T, et al.: Utility of oral fluid in compliance monitoring of opioid medications. Pain Physician. 2014; 17: 63-70.

Cone E, Huestis M: Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007; 1098: 51-103.

McLellan A, Lewis D, O’Brien C, et al.: Drug dependence, a chronic mental illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. J Am Med Assoc. 2000; 284(13): 1689-1695.

Heltsley R, DePriest A, Black D, et al.: Oral fluid drug testing of chronic pain patients. II. Comparison of paired oral fluid and urine specimens. J Anal Toxicol. 2012; 2(26): 75-80.

Vindenes V, Yttredal B, Oiestad E, et al.: Oral fluid is a viable alternative for monitoring drug abuse: Detection of drugs in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to the results from urine samples from patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine. J Anal Toxicol. 2011; 35: 32-39.

Presley L, Lehrer M, Seiter W, et al.: High prevalence of 6-acetylmorphine in morphine-positive oral fluid specimens. Forensic Sci Int. 2003; 133: 22-25.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2015.0293

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.