The use of urine drug monitoring in chronic opioid therapy: An analysis of current clinician behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2013.0153Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better quantify how urine drug monitoring (UDM) is used in clinical practice. Little is known about which patients are monitored, how often patients are monitored, which substances are important to detect, and under what circumstances clinicians modify the frequency of monitoring.
Design: An online survey was developed based on qualitative phone interviews with eight clinicians who use UDM as a routine component of clinical practice.
Participants: One thousand fourteen randomly selected clinicians known to order urine toxicology screenings were invited by mail in June 2011 to respond to the online survey assessing their clinical needs and preferences regarding UDM.
Results: Of the 93 respondents, 76 percent (n = 72) require all new patients to have UDM performed when they enter their clinic. The majority administer UDM to patients four times a year. The most common reasons cited by clinicians for a change in the frequency of monitoring are patient history of substance abuse and aberrant behaviors. Overall, the respondents showed broad support to test patients consistently for the most common illicit drugs, the majority of opioids, and a handful of prescription medications associated with abuse.
Conclusion: Despite a lack of agreement between guidelines informing the use of UDM, there appears to be a general consensus among practitioners that use UDM on: which patients to monitor, how often to monitor, and which substances are most important to detect.
Keywords: urine drug monitoring, chronic opioid therapy
References
Model Policy for the Use of Controlled Substances for the
Treatment of Pain Federation of State Medical Boards of the
United States, Inc. May 2004.
Bolen J: Quick Brief® on Informed Consent (The Third
Component of the Federation of State Medical Boards Medical
Policy, May 2004). April 9, 2005.
Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, et al.: Clinical guidelines for
the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain.
J Pain. 2009; 10(2): 113-130.
Adams NJ, Plane MB, Fleming MF, et al.: Opioids and the
treatment of chronic pain in a primary care sample. J Pain
Symptom Manage. 2001; 22(3): 791-796.
Bhamb B, Brown D, Hariharan J, et al.: Survey of select practice behaviors by primary care physicians on the use of opioids for chronic pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(9): 1859-1865.
Boulanger A, Clark AJ, Squire P, et al.: Chronic pain in
Canada: Have we improved our management of chronic noncancer pain? Pain Res Manag. 2007; 12(1): 39-47.
Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM, et al.: Drug poisoning
deaths in the United States, 1980-2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2011; 81: 1-8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):
Emergency department visits involving nonmedical use of
selected prescription drugs–United States, 2004-2008. MMWR
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010; 59(23): 705-709.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). Available at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx. Updated 2009.
Accessed January 11, 2011.
Peppin JF, Passik SD, Couto JE, et al.: Recommendations for urine drug monitoring as a component of opioid therapy in thetreatment of chronic pain. Pain Med. 2012; 13(7): 886-896.
Pesce A, West C, Egan City K, et al.: Interpretation of urine drug testing in pain patients. Pain Med. 2012; 13(7): 868-885.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2005-2024, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
