Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A systematic review of smartphone applications for chronic pain available for download in the United States

Lorraine S. Wallace, PhD, Lara K. Dhingra, PhD

Abstract


Objective: A Smartphone app could be useful in aiding patients in self-monitoring and self-managing their chronic pain-related symptoms. The purpose of this study was to systematically review English-language pain-related Smartphone apps available for download in the United States.

Design: During July 2012, official Android, BlackBerry, and iPhone Smartphone app platform stores were searched. “Pain” was entered into the search-bar of each Smartphone app store. Of the pain apps meeting inclusion criteria, the following were retrieved: release date, download cost (US dollars [US $], file size, documentation of a healthcare professional’s (HCP) involvement in app development, primary purpose of the app (pain education, pain self-management, or a combination of pain education and self-management), targeted pain-related condition(s), and inclusion of features that addressed four common self-monitoring and/or management strategies.

Results: Of the 220 apps meeting inclusion criteria, the majority were available through the iPhone (80.0 percent). The cost for downloading each app ranged from US $0.00 to 89.99; however, the majority of apps were US $4.99. There was no evidence of HCP involvement in the development of the majority of apps (65.0 percent). Chronic, nonspecific pain was the focus of half (50.5 percent) of the apps, followed by back and/or neck pain (25.9 percent). The primary purpose of the apps was categorized as follows: pain education (n = 53, 24.1 percent), pain self-management (n = 137, 62.3 percent), and both pain education and self-management (n = 30, 13.6 percent).

Conclusion: Overall, most of the pain-related apps included within our review not only lacked evidence of HCP input regarding development but also contained few evidence-based pain management features.


Keywords


smartphone applications, mobile health (mHealth), pain management, systematic review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Smith A: 46% of American adults are smartphone owners. 2012. Available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012.aspx. Accessed July 2, 2013.

Rainie L: The rise of the e-Patient. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Presentations/2012/Jan/The-Rise-of-the-ePatient.aspx. Accessed April 8, 2013.

Sarasohn-Kahn J: How smartphones are changing health care for consumers and providers. California HealthCare Foundation, 2010. Available at http://www.chcf.org/publications/2010/04/how-smartphones-are-changing-health-care-for-consumers-and-providers. Accessed July 2, 2013.

Caudill-Slosberg MA, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S: Office visits and analgesic prescriptions for musculoskeletal pain in US: 1980 vs. 2000. Pain. 2004; 109: 514-519.

Rosser BA, Eccleston C: Smartphone applications for pain management. J TelemedTelecare. 2011; 17: 308-312.

The Bellagio eHealth Evaluation Group: Call to action on global eHealth evaluation: Consensus statement of the WHO Global eHealth Evaluation Meeting, Bellagio, September 2011. Available at http://www.ghdonline.org/tech/discussion/who-global-observatory-for-ehealths-report-on-eh-2/?ref_related_content#artifactdetail-507008. Accessed July 1, 2013.

Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A: Treatment of chronic noncancer pain. Lancet. 2011; 377: 2226-2235.

Davis M, Zautra A: On-line training of mindfulness-based emotion regulation for fibromyalgia: Results of a small randomized trial. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46: 273-284.

Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al.: The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24: 769-781.

Smitherman TA, Burch R, Sheikh H, et al.: The prevalence, impact, and treatment of migraine and severe headaches in the United States: A review of statistics from national surveillance studies. Headache. 2013; 53: 427-436.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2014.0193

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.