Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of intrathecal sufentanil and morphine in hyperbaric bupivacaine-based spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

Authors

  • Gaetano Draisci, MD
  • Luciano Frassanito, MD
  • Raffaella Pinto, MD
  • Bruno Zanfini, MD
  • Gabriella Ferrandina, MD
  • Alessio Valente, MD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2009.0021

Keywords:

spinal anesthesia, local anesthetic, postoperative pain, spinal opioids, cesarean section

Abstract

Subarachnoid block is a widely used technique for cesarean section. Opioids adding to the local anesthetics can improve its quality. In this prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial, we compared the effects of coadministration of intrathecal sufentanil and morphine with intrathecal sufentanil and a single administration of subcutaneous morphine. Sixty-four pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were assigned to two groups according to the way of administration of morphine: intrathecal sufentanil (5 μg) plus intrathecal morphine (150 μg) (ITM group), and intrathecal sufentanil (5 μg) plus single administration of 10 mg subcutaneous morphine (SCM group). In both groups, the local anesthetic used was hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 percent (10 mg). Both groups received 1 g acetaminophen every 6 hours. In the postoperative period, pain was recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) and intravenous tramadol (100 mg) was administered if VAS score was >40 mm. Collateral effects, such us nausea, itching, respiratory depression, and sedation were assessed. VAS scores at rest and on coughing were significantly higher in the SCM group than in the ITM group between 3 and 24 hours. The mean titrated dose of tramadol consumed was also significantly greater in the SCM group than in the ITM group (p < 0.05). The time to first administration of tramadol was lower in the SCM group versus the ITM group (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the SCM group than in the ITM group (p < 0.05). There was no significant group difference in the incidence of pruritus (p > 0.05). In conclusion, coadministration of sufentanil and morphine into the subarachnoid space was effective and provided longer pain relief than intrathecal sufentanil plus a single injection of subcutaneous morphine, despite a higher incidence of side effects such as nausea and vomiting.

Author Biographies

Gaetano Draisci, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Luciano Frassanito, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Raffaella Pinto, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Bruno Zanfini, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Gabriella Ferrandina, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Alessio Valente, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

References

Hawkins JL, Gibbs CP, Orleans M, et al.: Obstetric anestrk force survey. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87: 135-143.

Liu SS, McDonald SB: Current issues in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001; 94: 888-906.

Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos AC: Post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(5 Suppl): S62-S69.

Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, et al.: Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients uundergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1919-1927.

Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, et al.: Doseresponse relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999; 90: 437-444.

Dahlgren G, Hultstrand C, Jakobsson J, et al.: Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for caesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85: 1288-1293.

Lim Y, Wilson S, Katz S: A comparison of patient-controlled epidural pethidine vs. nurse-administered epidural pethidine for analgesia after caesarean section. J Opioid Manag. 2006; 2(2): 99-104.

Culebras X, Gaggero G, Zatloukal J, et al.: Advantages of intrathecal nalbuphine, compared with intrathecal morphine, after cesarean delivery: An evaluation of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91: 601-605.

Braga Ade F, Braga FS, Poterio GM, et al.: Sufentanil added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for subarachnoid block in Caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20: 631-635.

Bailey PL, Rhondeau S, Schafer PG, et al.: Dose-response pharmacology of intrathecal morphine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993; 79: 49-59.

Ummenhofer WC, Arends RH, Shen DD, et al.: Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92: 739-753.

Mason N, Gondret R, Junca A, et al.: Intrathecal sufentanil and morphine for postthoracotomy pain relief. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 86: 236-240.

Liu N, Kuhlman G, Dalibon N, et al.: A randomized, doubleblinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 31-36.

Yazigi A, Chalhoub V, Madi-Jebara S, et al.: Prophylactic ondansetron is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting but not on pruritus after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2002; 14: 183-186.

Pocock SJ: The size of a clinical trial. In Pocock SJ (ed.): Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1996: 123-138.

Munro AJ, Long GT, Sleigh JW: Nurse-administered subcutaneous morphine is a satisfactory alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87: 11-15.

Swart M, Sewell J, Thomas D: Intrathecal morphine for caesarean section: An assessment of pain relief, satisfaction and side-effects. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 373-377.

Chadwick HS, Ready LB: Intrathecal and epidural morphine sulfate for post-cesarean analgesia–A clinical comparison. Anesthesiology. 1988; 68: 925-929.

Gerancher JC, Floyd H, Eisenach J: Determination of an effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88: 346-351.

Abram SE, Mampilly GA, Milosavljevic D: Assessment of the potency and intrinsic activity of systemic versus intrathecal opioids in rats. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87: 127-134.

Abouleish E, Rawal N, Rashad MN: The addition of 0.2 mg subarachnoid morphine to hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: A prospective study of 856 cases. Reg Anesth. 1991; 16: 137-140.

Alhashemi JA, Crosby ET, Grodecki W, et al.: Treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus following caesarean section. Can J Anaesth. 1997; 44: 1060-1065.

Karaman S, Kocabas S, Uyar M, et al.: The effects of sufentanil or morphine added to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006; 23: 285-291.

Hadi I, da Silva O, Natale R, et al.: Opioids in the parturient with chronic nonmalignant pain: A retrospective review. J Opioid Manag. 2006; 2(1): 31-34.

Published

01/29/2018

How to Cite

Draisci, MD, G., L. Frassanito, MD, R. Pinto, MD, B. Zanfini, MD, G. Ferrandina, MD, and A. Valente, MD. “Safety and Effectiveness of Coadministration of Intrathecal Sufentanil and Morphine in Hyperbaric Bupivacaine-Based Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section”. Journal of Opioid Management, vol. 5, no. 4, Jan. 2018, pp. 197-02, doi:10.5055/jom.2009.0021.

Issue

Section

Articles